• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Terry Patten

Author. Teacher. (R)evolutionary | Co-creating a New Republic of the Heart. Claim Your Citizenship now.

  • A New Republic of the Heart
    • Table of Contents
    • Resources
    • Praise
    • Press Kit / Media
    • Course Home
  • About
    • Purpose
    • About
    • Terry’s Full Bio
    • Books
      • A New Republic of the Heart
      • Integral Life Practice
    • Privacy Policy
  • Blog
  • Audio
  • Video
  • Events
  • Media/Press

Iran

Iran 2009 — A New Kind of Revolution (4)

June 22, 2009 By Terry Filed Under: Essays Tags: Iran, revolution

How can we help those who are demonstrating and dying on the streets?

I think that what we are already doing — paying rapt attention — is the most powerful thing Americans can do to empower Iran’s popular uprising. If the USA is preceived to be attempting to interfere, we empower repression. If we become a factor in the process, we muddy the waters. But if we simply pay attention, with open hearts and minds, and if we let ourselves be affected by what we see, and if we speak publicly about our human and moral perceptions, in public forums that Iranians can access, we help. It will be obvious that we are paying attention, that we are emotionally involved in witnessing their cultural confrontation, that we are moved and inspired by their courage, dignity, and restraint, that we are learning from their examples.

Mutual awareness involves taking new perspectives. That tends to serve growth into more nuanced structures of awareness. In this moment, the world’s simple witnessing awareness is making a subtle, but fundamental and benignly transformative difference. We are helping by sympathetically identifying with their symbolic martyr, Neda, her family, and her nation.

When the whole world is watching, heroes are seen, and thus empowered. (At least their sacrifice does not go unnoticed.) The world’s rapt attention makese a difference. The observed is changed by the presence of the observer. This intersubjective connection, this imperfect empathic urge unites us with Iranians in a larger “we-space.”

It is a subtle difference, and it doesn’t necessarily change behavior, except as new understandings naturally evoke new behavioral choices. But this simple shift might prove to be the “iota” of difference, the “straw” that tips the balance scales (which may tip only over months or years) in favor of reform and progress in Iran.

Iran 2009 — A New Kind of Revolution (3)

June 22, 2009 By Terry Filed Under: Essays Tags: Integral, Iran, revolution

Integral Perspectives on Iran’s Cultural Divide

In Integral terms, the demonstrators can be distinguished from the regime’s supporters by cultural qualities relating to states, stages, and relationships to shadow.

High states are part of the ethos both of the demonstrators and of the regime’s true believers. Most of these high states are evoked by acts of self-transcendence, whether they be self-abnegation or self-sacrifice, whether they be gross physical acts or subtle emotional or mental acts.

Persians are poets and revolutionaries, a heartfelt, brooding, noble, and passionate people. Each year, on Ashura, faithful grassroots Shia men go into a trance and beat themselves bloody to commemorate the martyrdom of Imam Hosayn Ibn Ali, in memory of whom Shiism originally emerged. Sufi mystics go together into trances in which they dance and sing and enter into ecstatic communion with Allah. Ancient Persian poetry is full of ecstatic mystic language, expressing a rich and passionate love affair with God. Modern Persian poetry is full of ecstatic emotional language, expressing a rich and passionate love affair with life, and pain, and death.

The structure of Iranians’ values are still centered in traditional agreements about symbols, tones, morés and resonances. But their values also now include certain modern and postmodern values like common sense, respect for the dignity of others, thinking for oneself, and the curiosity to observe the modern world directly. Their values are not altogether modern; but they are not exclusively conformist.

Their eyes have noticed a myriad of details and evidence and colors and shades of grey that the regime is telling them aren’t there. “Are you going to believe me or your lying eyes?” Everyone “in their right mind” knows the regime has lied to them.

The demonstrators include people with modern and postmodern and even integral values, but the center of gravity that divides them from the traditionalists is just a half-step beyond traditional, the early “expert” interest in taking a critical perspective on the evidence they have, not the modern “achiever’s” inclination to interpret experience in terms of a modern or postmodern systemic or paradigmatic analysis.

But Iranians will see the images of themselves reflected in the eyes of the outside world. And this will affect the dynamics. The excitement that comes from so much positive attention will be combined with the implicit meta-perspective that comes from imagining how you look to others. How much new evolutionary depth will this catalyze in Iranian thinking and perspective-taking?

A shadow most fiercely denied is usually projected. This happens at the level of individuals but also at the level of whole cultures. Cultural projection has been at the heart of the psychology behind the regime’s propaganda for years. By pointing to foreign enemies, by projecting its own xenophobia, the Islamic Republic has been able to coerce national unity.

The demonstrators want to take a new look at all that, to restore their connection to the larger world. They want Iran’s internal narrative to evolve, to reflectively discard what is not working and make new moves that will produce better results. They are taking the first baby step toward re-owning their cultural projection.

Postmodern nonviolence has been playing an important role in the resolution. Iranian society is sufficiently interconnected and self-reflective for this to have powerful impacts, even if Iran is not sufficiently modern in its values and conscience for nonviolence to succeed as directly it did for Gandhi in his struggle against the British Empire.

I hope that in the days ahead the Iranian people are able to get through to their cousins and friends in the police, armed services, Revolutionary Guard, basij, and government ministries. I hope that the institutions of Iranian society will reflect and flex in response to this horror, and shift its stance and nature. I hope that there can be a transition of values and behavior within the Islamic Republic with a minimum of violence and destruction.

However, cultural freedom may not come to Iran until those who “get it” are not just the most conscious members of Iranian society, but the most effective actors — in the institutions (of government, religion, and society) and on the streets. Moral authority needs elemental strength. The change the Iranian people are calling for so eloquently will not complete itself until trustable leaders are able to grasp the levers of power.

New levels of consciousness sometimes don’t replace the old until they can take more effective responsibility for all the brutal facts of life. Good-hearted Iranians cannot cede the military, the government, and the clerical institutions to fanatics and realistically expect to retain their own freedom. This will become a passionate and frank conversation in thousands of homes and offices across Iran. It will be worked out by the Iranian people, on terms we can only partially comprehend.

Click here for part 4.

Iran 2009 — A New Kind of Revolution (2)

June 22, 2009 By Terry Filed Under: Essays Tags: Iran, revolution

The uprising is fragmented. Its unity only concerns outrage against the clumsiness of the vote fraud. Ali Laranjani’s public statement questioning the vote tally was very mild, and buried in a series of denunciations of foreign powers for their public statements condemning the Iranian government. In the moderately arch-conservative no-man’s-land between Mousavi and Khamenei are perhaps dozens of potential kingmakers, including Laranjani.

Americans should not be confused into thinking that anti-Americanism will go away after this uprising reshapes the regime. Iranians have grown up hearing stories of how the U.S. plotted and financed the Shah before the overthrow of Mosaddeq’s fledgling democratic government in 1954 (after he nationalized BP’s Iranian oil holdings), how the US supported the Shah even when he brutally suppressed and exploited his subjects, how the US winked, financed, and even sold ingredients for chemical weapons to Sadaam which he used to maim thousands of Iranians in the Iran-Iraq war, including thousands of wounded veterans who are visible heroes who can be seen throughout Iranian society.

Mostly Iranians are fiercely proud of Iran. Nationalistic rhetoric resonates. This uprising is one enacted by nationalists against other nationalists. But it is not united and fueled by resentment of foreign imperialism.  Iranians’ common cause is their stand for their human dignity, their refusal to be bullied to give lip service to what they see as transparent electoral cheating. Will this prove strong enough to prevail? We’ll soon see.

As brutal as are their divisions, all Iranian players are nationalists, motivated by patriotic feelings. Persia has a strong national strain of mystical intensity. Their ethos celebrates feats of strength, endurance, sacrifice, and bravery that are enacted in passionate, intense, altered states of consciousness. These high states are linked to passionate emotions. If the cause is clearly righteous, and volunteers are seen to be noble and needed, there are thousands of potential martyrs in Iran.

Thus, there will be a compromise, or there will be disaster.  Anything but compromise would require Khamenei and Ahmadinejad to tear apart their country with purges of most of their best-educated countrymen, in something analogous to China’s cultural revolution. Every institution of Iranian civil society contains large numbers of people who question the election and the Supreme Leader.

There are just too many people who might think for themselves. Meanwhile, Iranians of all stripes are getting a huge dose of new experiences of the very kind that is most likely to stimulate them to rethink a lot of things.
Iranians are being empowered by current events. The eyes of the world have been on Iran in a whole new way — sympathetically, admiringly, appreciatively, not as hostile pariahs. And the star of the show during this great moment of history has been Iran’s ordinary Iranians. How will it affect a whole nation to experience this change of perceptions. What is it like, under these cultural and historical circumstances, to go from  being seen as the “axis of evil” to the most admired and heroic of the world’s citizens?

There are millions of people who saw the rigged election results as an unacceptable insult to their intelligence and dignity. “We’re smarter than you think!” they are saying. Mousavi, Montezeri, and Khatami have said it too. But then, a popular movement spontaneously erupted, and the crowds pushed Mousavi further than he would have ventured on his own.

The demonstrations were spontaneous, emotional, and yet still patriotic, still using the traditional symbols and gestures. They marched holding copies of the Koran, they shouted “Allah-o-Akbar” from the rooftops, they declared days of mourning. They very naturally adopted much of the rhetoric and tactics of the revolution that brought the Islamic Republic of Iran into existence. They wanted their experience of justice to be seen.

And what is being mirrored back by the “whole world watching” is respect and congratulations.

Click here for part 3.

Iran 2009 — A New Kind of Revolution (1)

June 22, 2009 By Terry Filed Under: Essays Tags: Iran, revolution

An Overview of the Transformative Events of June 2009

I think the events we have been seeing this month —June 2009 — represent a seismic shift, a great exclamation point in the punctuated evolution of the Islamic Republic. It is not just a political shift. This week of demonstrations, involving the shutdown of much of Iran, including the government’s intermittent shutdown of its whole communications infrastructure, have affected people who previously were not terribly activist, or reformist. Many have been radicalized. Many more have been forced to think. And feel.

Perceptions so far, politically:

Ahmadinejad seems to have been weakened tremendously. He can no longer pull off his “man of the people” act in the same way as before. He appears suddenly crude to his countrymen. He can still do damage, but his larger influence will be in decline.

Khamenei has probably lost his aura of legitimate, overwhelming authority. He has been publicly discredited in the eyes of at least half the people, and many of the members of the clerical establishment. The very function of “Supreme Leader” is no longer secure.

Mousavi has become the man of the hour — the righteous leader wronged by corrupt authorities, the “Hossain” archetype of martyrdom that is the central theme of Persian Islam. This makes him dangerous, and puts him in serious danger.

Former President Rafsanjani is the wiliest and most powerful of the big players, and he’s been the only one who has been publicly silent — and very active behind the scenes. Through the Assembly of Experts or the military, he could become the new kingmaker, or he may be in a difficult struggle for his political survival.

Former President Khatami, the also-ran Presidential candidates Karroubi and Rezai, Grand Ayatollah’s Montazeri and Saanai, and Ayatollahs Javadi Ameli, Amini and Ostadi have all publicly challenged the accuracy of the electoral results announced by the Ministry of the Interior. More and more stakeholders in the Islamic Republic have been alienated by the regime’s violent repression of its own citizens.

Even Ali Laranjani, the former nuclear negotiator and arch-conservative architect of the brutal suppression of the student demonstrators of 2003, has publicly questioned the official tally (which makes sense, given his history of conflict with Ahmadinejad.

Although the regime has the guns and the will to use them, there are real limits to the regime’s ability to exercise this power.

Even if there is no evidence of centrally-organized-and-executed fraud, everyone knows the elections system was staffed with Ahmadinejad’s political employees. If any disgruntled employee of the elections system goes public with stories of electoral fraud (even anonymously, with a well-told story in a local blog, which is almost sure to happen) Ahmadinejad and Khamenei  will both be even more fatally weakened.

All this is happening at a time when all Iranians have been deputized as journalists and historians by their mere possession of a cell phone with text capabilities or a still or video camera. People who would never before have used their cameras now realize they are holding a weapon. How will this affect their neighbors who worked in any humble position and observed something “fishy” at any of the polling places? Even if all participants were carefully screened, this society is too divided for the regime to feel arrogantly certain that even minor electoral cheating will not be exposed in the weeks ahead.

Worse yet, it is likely to go viral, further wresting control of the narrative from the leaders, like the martyrdom of the young Iranian woman, Neda, who was shot dead by the Basij in front of a video camera and the eyes of the world. She is becoming a heroine, the most visible martyr of this uprising.

Political and Cultural Undercurrents

Meanwhile, Laranjani and Rezai are military men, and Rajsanjani has many military supporters, so the entire military is not in lockstep unity with Khamenei and Ahmadenijad. The basij and the Revolutionary Guard (Ahmadinejad’s original constituency) are controlled by true-believer Islamic neoconservatives. But the regular Iranian Armed Forces are public institutions, containing fighting men from every segment of Iranian society. Right now all the guns on the streets belong to the regime’s guys. But that monopoly is not absolute. Ultimately, all parties know they are vulnerable. 

This is also a generational confrontation, with Ahmadinejad’s youthful faction emboldened by its momentum. But most young Iranians are equally passionate, and better educated. Ahmadinejad’s cohort overplayed their hand. Their best option now is to retain power and minimize losses.

Many of the senior leaders in Iranian society have serious misgivings about Khamenei’s harsh response to the demonstrations. They and the people behind the opposition movement (most of them young and impassioned) cannot all be purged and marginalized. They are too many, too pervasive. The regime cannot simply suppress and purge all of its opponents. The nation cannot sustain the economic injuries that would come from long shutdowns of Iran’s Internet and text messaging systems.

The long-term momentum belongs to the opposition. The regime cannot completely suppress this citizen uprising because the opposition sees itself as heroic in a broad new struggle. The opposition has been energized and ennobled, while the regime has become angry, brutal and unimaginative. It’s hard to estimate how big a factor this advantage (in energy, style, and panaché) will prove to be.

Click here for more.

Integral In Iran – 2009

June 22, 2009 By Terry Filed Under: Essays Tags: diplomacy, Integral, Iran

In spring 2007 I visited Iran as a member of a citizen’s diplomacy delegation. The day after we arrived in Tehran, our meetings with former President Khatami, Grand Ayatollah Saanei, peace activist Emmadin Baghi, and Nobel Prize winner Shirin Ebadi were abruptly cancelled. Our cell phone calls and emails had been (and would continue to be) monitored; our activities were reorganized and were strictly controlled by Ahmedinejad’s faction.

Most of the government officials, citizens, clerics, students, professors and wounded veterans, with whom I was able to meet were conservatives. Our every move was monitored by the Ershad secret police. Big brother was definitely watching. And yet this “curse” turned out to be a blessing in disguise. I confronted and explored the much wider gulf that separated the perspectives of Ahmadinejad’s faction from my western sensibilities. (And of course, I had encounters with many much freer spirits here and there along the way.)

In the process, I learned much more about the Iranian soul than I could have dreamed going in. I encountered the intense spiritual passions of the Shia ways that catalyzed startling insights. It humbled me to see how a vast amount of what is under the surface of contemporary Iranian culture and politics tends be opaque to modern Western eyes.

Footer

Keep in Touch

Get news and updates from Terry

  • We’ll send you dispatches from Terry’s work, which will feature talks, writings, and conversations that connect you with our global movement for wholeness. These will include opportunities to become directly involved in both inner-spiritual and outer-communal work through Terry’s non-profit organization A New Republic of the Heart, as well as affiliated teachers and communities.

Thank you for stepping up! How can I connect with you?

  • We’ll send you dispatches from Terry’s work, which will feature talks, writings, and conversations that connect you with our global movement for wholeness. These will include opportunities to become directly involved in both inner-spiritual and outer-communal work through Terry’s non-profit organization A New Republic of the Heart, as well as affiliated teachers and communities.

Get news and updates from Terry

  • We’ll send you dispatches from Terry’s work, which will feature talks, writings, and conversations that connect you with our global movement for wholeness. These will include opportunities to become directly involved in both inner-spiritual and outer-communal work through Terry’s non-profit organization A New Republic of the Heart, as well as affiliated teachers and communities.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Privacy Policy

Keep in Touch

Sign Up for Terry’s Newsletter




  • We’ll send you dispatches from Terry’s work, which will feature talks, writings, and conversations that connect you with our global movement for wholeness. These will include opportunities to become directly involved in both inner-spiritual and outer-communal work through Terry’s non-profit organization A New Republic of the Heart, as well as affiliated teachers and communities.







Recent Posts

  • With Tender Hearts, We Share News of Terry’s Passing
  • Appreciating Your Care & Help, and a Personal Update
  • Spiritual Friends Amidst Cultural Madness: The Power of Our Grateful Generosity
  • Just Published: Biocircuits: The Natural Tool that Promotes Sleep, Boosts Energy, and Expands Awareness
  • Dispatches from A New Republic of the Heart Podcast Kickstarter Campaign

Recent Comments

  • nancy gilliam on So Much to Be Grateful For — Even With So Much to Grieve
  • Arleen HollenhorstVisitor on So Much to Be Grateful For — Even With So Much to Grieve
  • VisitorPhilip van den Heever on Universal spirit and our unique soul journeys
  • VisitorBette j Bishop on Universal spirit and our unique soul journeys
  • Ronald Bell -- Rev. PC(USA) on On Marc Gafni

Archives

  • November 2021
  • July 2021
  • January 2021
  • May 2020
  • October 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • December 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • December 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • May 2012
  • March 2012
  • November 2011
  • June 2011
  • March 2011
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • April 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • January 2009
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007

Categories

  • Articles & Interviews
  • Audio
  • Essays
  • Featured
  • News
  • PDF
  • Poem
  • Uncategorized
  • Video

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2025 Terry Patten · Privacy Policy · Log in